Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Nicholas Bernstein
Date/Time:	Sat, August 18, 2001 at 11:28 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	Not Quite
Message:
You are a little too late to the discussion we have been having on this board over the last few days. Your proposal does not in any way address the problem of closed registrar lists. I believe what Afilias now has in place is quite satisfactory. Especially if they will be letting the original Land Rush participants have first chance at getting names successfully challenged by Afilias.

Message Thread:

• Another Solution? — Dryweave, August 18 @ 7:42 AM (2/10)
• and Richyhenderson's plan — Dryweave, August 18 @ 7:49 AM (1/1)
• i aggree too. — 2oo1, August 18 @ 11:17 AM (0/0)
• this is similar to Dombase's plan... — Dryweave, August 18 @ 7:47 AM (1/7)
• Yep.  Good analogies are worth their weight in gold ;) — DomeBase, August 18 @ 7:55 AM (1/6)
• OK - now all phone Afilias with this plan! — richyhenderson, August 18 @ 10:30 AM (2/5)
• (Afilias challenge & LR reserve) vs. (LR challenge w/o TM) — DomeBase, August 18 @ 5:33 PM (1/1)
• I agree with you Domebase — richyhenderson, August 19 @ 11:43 AM (0/0)
• Not Quite — Nicholas Bernstein, August 18 @ 11:28 AM (2/2)
• Please Provide Info — Dryweave, August 19 @ 3:40 AM (0/0)
• The ALL names at Landrush solution is so simple — richyhenderson, August 18 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy