Not one single person has given logical reason why this belief is wrong.
from my posting of May 22, 2001
Time Warner took aimster.com from the legal owner, on the premise it was protecting
its own trademark.
Aimster includes “aim” - an AOL trademark.
There are 345 “aim”
trademarks in the USA alone.
claim to be protecting own trademark, it has to be your unique trademark - else yours
is not distinct from others of same name - which is illegal.
Nearly every domain
“infringes trademarks” or “confuses users” - because of the authorities, it cannot
It is just bull* excuse used to steal domains.
*** end quote
abuse their marks.
The LAW is just used to protect the rich and corporations.
US Government give you the finger, for your First Amendment Rights.
just a word they hide behind - as can be seen from their spin, lies and propaganda.
authorities know the solution - name.class.country.reg
Redirecting .com (.info
.biz etc) to the .REG address will avoid 'consumer confusion', 'trademark conflict'
problems and to stop anybody 'passing off'.
apple.com redirected to apple.computer.us.reg
redirected to apple.record.uk.reg
No 'consumer confusion', 'trademark conflict'
or 'passing off'.
.REG acts as certificate of authentication and directory.
a person gets apple.info - consumer is not redirected to a .REG site - so NO problems.
US GOVERNMENT DO NOT DENY THEY KNOW THIS SOLUTION.
Quote from USPTO (August 22,
2000), "The questions you raised with respect to trademark conflicts, as well as
the proposed solutions, have their basis in good common-sense. As such, they have
been debated and discussed quite exhaustively within the USPTO, the Administration,
To my logical and informed mind this proves them corrupt,
beyond all doubt.
What do you the Jury say?