Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Gregory W. Krajewski
Date/Time:	Sat, August 25, 2001 at 10:25 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	I think the "internet challenge" intentions are still very noble...
Message:
I think Afilias would not even begin to gather even half of these domains if it weren't for someone to be a focal point, whereby someone can send this information.  Afilias has to look partial in this matter.  Also if Afilias thought the "internet challenge" was doing something harmful Richard would have gotten a "cease and desist" order.  He is very specific that he is not passing judgement on these domains.  I also agree with you that this style of Sunrise cannot continue in future rollouts.  The entire English language would become trademarked.  The Digital Divide would increase because poorer nations would not have any kind of chance to register a domain for a reasonable cost.  As it is right now a Trademark is about $400 USD, and the domain itself is $35 per year.  Gregory

Message Thread:

• The INTERNET CHALLENGE is the BIGGEST SCAM ! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25 @ 9:19 PM (7/28)
• the registrant of sex.info has no valid trademark — Lazy, August 28 @ 8:54 AM (0/0)
• What a bunch of bull — fred48, August 26 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)
• re: — crs, August 26 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
• Thanks CRS for major contribution to DomeBase Proposal idea — DomeBase, August 26 @ 3:00 PM (0/0)
• Dear Nicholas — DomeBase, August 25 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
• Afilias are doing the right thing challenging the sunrise fraudsters — Elvis, August 25 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)
• Anyone can "challenge" the names taken in the sunrise...What's your problem? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:06 PM (1/8)
• I have NO problem, It seems YOU have a PROBLEM — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25 @ 10:43 PM (1/7)
• If they had the technology Nicholas as you state.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:56 PM (1/6)
• Where have you been? You've lied enough! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25 @ 11:55 PM (1/5)
• Now you're after me? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 26 @ 12:12 AM (1/4)
• You're Paranoid ! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 26 @ 12:27 AM (1/3)
• Children, behave... — dtobias, August 26 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)
• I agree Dan.......My apologies Nicholas — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 26 @ 1:05 AM (1/1)
• Apology accepted Gregory — Nicholas Bernstein, August 26 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
• Good Point — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 9:55 PM (2/12)
• Wrong, wrong, wrong.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:11 PM (1/2)
• Sunrise — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:18 PM (1/1)
• I think the "internet challenge" intentions are still very noble... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
• In defence of the internet challenge — Elvis, August 25 @ 10:07 PM (1/8)
• Yes, I  Already Know That — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:12 PM (1/7)
• So Generic Words are o.k to trademark?  Think about what you are saying... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:13 PM (1/6)
• Only because its the law — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:22 PM (1/5)
• Agreed... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:34 PM (1/4)
• Your Right — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:39 PM (1/3)
• Indisputable fact and proof of corruption — Garry Anderson, August 26 @ 12:29 AM (1/2)
• Bravo! FYI, click here. — InternetAdvocate, August 27 @ 10:16 PM (1/1)
• Mike - they are more clever than us all — Garry Anderson, August 28 @ 9:58 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy