Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Nicholas Bernstein
Date/Time:	Sat, August 25, 2001 at 10:43 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	I have NO problem, It seems YOU have a PROBLEM
Message:
Firstly, I didn't register any domain during the sunrise and I take offence for you to suggest or imply that i did.  Secondly, "The Internet Challenge " is not spotting only suspicious regs., ie. no TM# or not proper TM#. That's the problem with this site - putting domains which have real TMs on it. Check it out for yourself, run sex.info in the USPTO.gov database, it is a real trademark, yet it is included on the site.  Now, if you had a real trademark would you want to defend it, do you think that person will enjoy defending themselves? Have you ever been to court or charged with a crime - do you think that those people enjoyed defending themselves even if they could prove their innocence? I think not.  Also, in this case, being challenged does subject oneself to a cost of $295.  Do you think that these people enjoy paying an additional $295 just because it is posted on "the internet challenge" and therefore it has been highlighted as a suspect registration?  Next time, think before you write! Finally, this may be hard for you to comprehend but Afilias does not need our help, they know and can easily find out all suspect TMs by performing alogrithms with various databases, along with parameters (ie. that is they can find all TMS registered after Oct.2,2000). The internet challenge website is fulfilly its own agenda (to get as many domains as it can) and has no credibilty. Nicholas

Message Thread:

• The INTERNET CHALLENGE is the BIGGEST SCAM ! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25 @ 9:19 PM (7/28)
• the registrant of sex.info has no valid trademark — Lazy, August 28 @ 8:54 AM (0/0)
• What a bunch of bull — fred48, August 26 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)
• re: — crs, August 26 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
• Thanks CRS for major contribution to DomeBase Proposal idea — DomeBase, August 26 @ 3:00 PM (0/0)
• Dear Nicholas — DomeBase, August 25 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
• Afilias are doing the right thing challenging the sunrise fraudsters — Elvis, August 25 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)
• Anyone can "challenge" the names taken in the sunrise...What's your problem? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:06 PM (1/8)
• I have NO problem, It seems YOU have a PROBLEM — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25 @ 10:43 PM (1/7)
• If they had the technology Nicholas as you state.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:56 PM (1/6)
• Where have you been? You've lied enough! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25 @ 11:55 PM (1/5)
• Now you're after me? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 26 @ 12:12 AM (1/4)
• You're Paranoid ! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 26 @ 12:27 AM (1/3)
• Children, behave... — dtobias, August 26 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)
• I agree Dan.......My apologies Nicholas — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 26 @ 1:05 AM (1/1)
• Apology accepted Gregory — Nicholas Bernstein, August 26 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
• Good Point — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 9:55 PM (2/12)
• Wrong, wrong, wrong.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:11 PM (1/2)
• Sunrise — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:18 PM (1/1)
• I think the "internet challenge" intentions are still very noble... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
• In defence of the internet challenge — Elvis, August 25 @ 10:07 PM (1/8)
• Yes, I  Already Know That — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:12 PM (1/7)
• So Generic Words are o.k to trademark?  Think about what you are saying... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:13 PM (1/6)
• Only because its the law — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:22 PM (1/5)
• Agreed... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25 @ 10:34 PM (1/4)
• Your Right — Paul Gill, August 25 @ 10:39 PM (1/3)
• Indisputable fact and proof of corruption — Garry Anderson, August 26 @ 12:29 AM (1/2)
• Bravo! FYI, click here. — InternetAdvocate, August 27 @ 10:16 PM (1/1)
• Mike - they are more clever than us all — Garry Anderson, August 28 @ 9:58 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy