Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Sun, August 26, 2001 at 3:38 PM GMT
||Netscape Communicator V4.0 using compatible; IDZap
||What a bunch of bull
Stop whining? You havent seen whining yet. Just wait
till it gets properly investigated. You point to an example of sex.info and a couple
others. Is this the one you checked out thoroughly? Was it so hard? Based on a logo
design? And this negates the many hundreds and potentially thousands of clearly fraudulent
registrations? Are you a comedian?|
"Richy, stop your whining. I and
everyone else, including yourself knew that there was NO guarantee that you would
get the domains that you pre-reg for. Was this too difficult for you to comprehend?"
was not difficult just merely impossible to believe that afilias themselves would
set up such a process that would clearly lead to this scandal. It is afilias's policies
that have led to the loss of our landrush. This was preventable by the registry themselves.
This wasnt Icann ending the extension or a change of dates, this was a sunrise policy
for trademark holders that doesnt check trademarks! Of course people are gonna scam
it. They have only a challenge process that doesnt encourage challenges because honest
people have nothing to gain and only $75 to lose.
Who are you kidding here?
should have held this special process after a landrush but then again you couldnt
make as much money like that.
And not all generic names are trademarked (exactly).
Are you deleberately trying to misinform?
Then you say:
"I call on everyone out
there not to waste their time anymore and DO NOT submit to the theinternetchallenge.com
- Lets NOT fulfill this guy's agenda of trying to list as many domains as he can."
on. You are just pushing us harder. Buried in all the fraudulent registrations is
a story of gross registrar based fraud, including regsitrar employee fraud. This
will lead to more serious investigations. Who knows to what doorstep this will lead?
is a great service.
Affilias be commended? Are you nuts? We shouldnt even be here
discussing this! If they would have just either done this properly ie checking
the validity of tms regardless of the cost before issuing registrations or at the
very least run the tm registration numbers through the main databases or be responsible
and have the special wipo process after landrush, all would be fine.
they run a trademark sunrise where trademarks are not checked and the only way to
challenge this fraud encouragement is by outlayying almost $300? You must be a comedian.
Just not a very good one.
You better belive that the uncovering of names and submitting
them to sites like theinternetchallenge and to news sites and investigative tv shows
is every honest persons agenda.
You aint seen nothing yet.