Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
dtobias |
Date/Time: |
Thu, August 30, 2001 at 12:12 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V5.0 using Windows dows |
Subject: |
Country names |
Message: |
|
I respectfully disagree. Plenty of sites use the names of countries, states,
and cities in a perfectly reasonable way for sites that discuss that locality (either
commercial or noncommercial). It's a very contentious issue whether the governments
involved have the right to force the transfer of those domains -- an ICANN UDRP case
awarded "barcelona.com" to the city government, but this case is widely regarded
as one where the panelist grossly violated the policy which should not have permitted
such a transfer where the domain had been used for a perfectly legitimate site.
The case is in U.S. courts now. Meanwhile, the government of South Africa have
given up in their attempts to force the transfer of southafrica.com. Governments
have proper places for their official sites within the appropriate country code domains,
like gov.za for South Africa. They have no special claim to "their name" in
all other TLDs, especially ones that are intended for commercial entities like .com
and .biz. They do have as much right as any other landrush participant to try
to get their name in .info, and as much right as anybody to object to fraudulent
sunrise applications by others not possessing trademark rights, but unless they own
trademark rights to their locality name (which is illegal in most countries which
bar geographical names from trademark protection) they do not have pre-emptive rights
over the name.
|
| |
Link: |
Dan's Domain Site: ICANN Disputes |
Message Thread:
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy