Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Fri, August 31, 2001 at 5:02 AM GMT
||Netscape Communicator V4.75 using Windows NT
ITEM B: Most registrar probably have this as part of
their registration agreement. Registrants have to 'agree' to these terms before
proceeding with the registration. Even if there is a 'check box' this does
not prevent the cybersquatters from lying.|
ITEM E: How is it possible to really
enforce this? What if somebody registered COMPUTERS.INFO and claims that they
have a trademark in Zimbawe. How in the world is the Registrar supposed to
validate this if this registration is challenged?
SUNRISE was crafted by
the IPC in order to get an unfair advantage at registering domain names before anybody
else. Why should trademark owners have first rights at any new TLD? The
introduction of new TLDs was to expand the domain space, not duplicate it.
Why should United Airlines be UNITED.SHOP, UNITED.KIDS, UNITED.SEX, UNITED.TLD?
face it, SUNRISE has FAILED, look at the SUNRISE mess from .INFO