Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: kerry
Date/Time: Sat, September 1, 2001 at 2:50 AM GMT (Fri, August 31, 2001 at 7:50 PM PDT)
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject: Some thoughts on the .info debacle

Message:
 

 
I've been lurking in this forum for a while now and finally wish to post...

The targets here seem to be Afilias and ICANN, but especially Afilias, for the way in which they allowed obviously bogus information to be used to register many highly sought after .info names, especially generic names.  I have seen little disgust being put forth towards the registrars themselves.  Seems to me that they, at least the ones that allowed this, perhaps are the most guilty for allowing these bogus registrations to slip through their systems in the first place (I say this knowing full well that Afilias should have had their own validation going on, too).  Didn't they have an obligation to provide correct/good information to Afilias?  Would it be worth it to concentrate some of the energy here towards ferreting out the most guilty registrars and perhaps going after them publicly?

Also, I'm not sure it's been mentioned, but is everyone aware that during the challenge period, the challenger only gets the $220 refund (if they win the challenge) if the respondent also puts up the $295 respondent fee? (Note: Every challenger has to put up a $75 non-refundable fee...even if they are not the "priority" challenger...only the priority challenger has to put up the additional $220 fee) This means that anyone that challenges an obviously bogus registration will for certain lose the full $295 challenge fee (because what respondent that used bogus information will respond to the challenge by putting up the fee...none).  This means that even legitimate trademark holders that challenge a name will pay $295 for the challenge and then another up to $175 ($35 per year x 5-year registration) for the registration, total cost around $470.  Seems to me even the legitimate trademark holders have a legitimate gripe here, too.

Lastly, I think it's time to move on from any idea that Afilias is going to make any of the names registered with bogus information available during the land rush.  It just won't happen.  Doing so would prevent legitimate trademark holders the opportunity to make a challenge.  Also, the idea that Afilias should allow all names to be made available during land rush and that the winner would serve as a "backup" to names already bogusly registered during sunrise and returned to the pool (given to the backup registrant) after Afilias makes their final challenges just won't fly either.  The processes that would have to be put in place to make this happen are fairly complex (read expensive) and there just isn't enough time left.  Perhaps putting pressure on Afilias to make sure they do a fair Land Rush II is where our efforts should lie.

Kerry
 


Message Thread: