>>..."land rush II may offer the best chance at something approaching
>>fairness">Why
is that fair to the thousands of people who have already paid
>thousands of
dollars for the Landrush I?
It's not (please re-read "approaching fairness").
>Why
is that fairer than the Domebase solution?
It's not (please re-read "approaching
fairness").
>Why is it fair to say to thousands of people, the money you spent
is
>just being cancelled out, and we'll all start again, and maybe you'd
>like
to pay all over again, and probably someone who never paid the
>first time
will get it instead of you?
It's not (please re-read "approaching fairness")...
BTW,
there *are* registrars that do not charge those fees. Some only charge a registration
fee if you get the name. Your beef is with your registrar in this regard, not
Afilias (see my other post in this thread).
>Why is it fair for a company like
Afilias to preside over a complete
>shambles, have the means to redress it
(Domebase), and then make the
>decent honest people who played fair be the
ones who are the biggest
>losers?
It's not (please re-read "approaching
fairness").
Unbelievable - treating people like shit!
And you think that's fair?
No...but
sorry, I don't believe the Domebase proposal is likely to fly, no matter how fair
you might believe it to be. I believe working towards an as-fair-as-possible
land rush II is the best that can be hoped for at this time.
Kerry