Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: challenge
Date/Time: Thu, September 6, 2001 at 5:46 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject: Robert Connelly's resignation letter...proof that some people actually care

Message:
 

 
       Dear Fellow Registrars:
In the last 38 years, I have never resigned from any group of which I was a
member (job, technical committee, Church or fraternity) as a protest.  I
had learned the hard way that it was impossible to change the group from
outside.  Rather, I have stayed engaged and did what I could to effect a
change from within.  There were times that it was tempting to resign from
the CORE Excom.

Now I face a dilemma.  I am one of 13 Directors of Afilias.  I was elected
for a three year term.  The terms were 3, 2 and 1 year based upon the
plurality of votes of other Afilias members.  I considered selection by my
peers to this position by such a majority to be a weighty
responsibility.  For those of us who understand Japan, "responsibility" is
a heavy weight upon our consciences.

I have not hidden my disappointment with the way the Sunrise Period turned
out.  It was an abomination.  There were some serious miscalculations of
what might happen.  Many registrants have made Landrush applications in
good faith only to see their selected domains cut out from under them
because of mostly fraudulent applications made by registrants who did not
have trademarks -- many of whom did not even make a credible pretense at
providing the required Trademark data.  While I was not a part of the
Technical Working Group, I was very active in the Policy Working Group
which crafted the Sunrise policy.

I was pleased when Afilias decided to become the challenger for obviously
fraudulent applications.

I have worked with registrants and public observers to craft a way to
provide fairness for the good faith applicants who have seen their
applications cut out from under them.

It was my proposal that each registrar escrow its queue of domains that
have been preempted -- to escrow them shortly after the Sunrise Period with
Afilias.  These would be run after the challenge period had been completed
later this year.  The reasons for escrowing them *now* rather than later
was to prevent additional applications for the same domains  from being
collected, which would jeopardize the modicum of fairness we would be able
to provide under my proposal.

During a teleconference on 13 August, I asked for a simple list of SLDs
registered during the Sunrise Period.  Said list would permit us to set
aside the applications for domains already taken during Sunrise.  I was
told that there was no provision for providing the SLDs but that I could
have the zone file.  To obtain the zone file, it would be necessary for us
to request it by submitting Appendix N.  I submitted our application on 14
August.

I was then told there was some ambiguity about the way Appendix N was
originally drafted.  I was to receive a corrected copy immediately.

Last week, I spoke about our need by telephone with a senior member of
Afilias management.  We discussed the Appendix N again and our need for the
zone file.  He said the corrected copy would be sent.   Still nothing.  I
am being pestered by applicants who don't want their applications sent
during land rush.  I am in agreement that they should not be submitted to
Afilias until a credible system is developed for disposing of the Sunrise
registrations successfully challenged.

We still don't have the zone file nor do we have an ETA for receiving it.
Most of our Directors and Officers are in Montevideo.  They will scarcely
get back to Newtown, PA in time for the Landrush to start next
Wednesday.  It is now almost too late to supply the zone file or to solicit
other registrars to prepare a "post landrush queue" of domains wrongly
registered during Sunrise.

While it is anathema to me to leave Afilias, I need to look at the broader
picture.  My responsibility does not stop with the other 17 members of
Afilias.  It extends to all Afilias Accredited Registrars, to .info
registrants, to ICANN and to the Internet Community in general.

I therefore believe that is would be best for us to dispose of the firm
which holds the shares of Afilias stock.  I shall not resign as a Director
at this time.  However, whoever acquires our firm will have the option of
appointing my replacement for the remaining two years left in my
term.  Maybe he or she will be able to get the job done.

Sorry it has come to this.  PSI-Japan will remain an Afilias Accredited
Registrar for .info and I shall continue be a constructive critic of
Afilias policies and practices.

Sincerely, BobC



     

 


Message Thread: