*******************
>>... if you really have
direct contact with these people please let us know who the anonymous person is behind
the username "Slicer", because your comments might then hold water. After all, you
know who we are. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air, and making blatantly false
accusations to support your original statement.
********************
ok, that
statement automatically excludes you from ANY future conversation involving online
rhetoric in ANY form. did you actually think that arguement was GOOD? if you would
have utilized even 1 of the 2 brain cells you got sitting up in that empty shell
of a head of yours, you'd immediately realize that YOU are just as anonymous Slicer.
just because you write your name down at the bottom doesn't mean you are who you
say you are. i mean, shit, you do understand that i'm not really jesus, don't you?
********************
>>Did
Tauzin retract the statements? No!
********************
another blazingly brillant
arguement. so what if he hasn't yet retracted the statements? with no date to confirm
when this letter was sent, he's either taken aback by his little fuck up and he's
finally seriously researching these issues before the retraction is printed (you
know, just to make sure he doesn't fuck up again), or the retraction confirmation
hasn't been put in print yet. think about it, if YOU were a politician, and keep
in mind what a politician does because so many of you here seem to forget that, would
you immediately print a retraction and just admit that you FUCKED UP, or would you
wait for the right time to put a spin on the issue here?
i know it's hard for you,
but think good and long on this one.
even if a retraction SHOULD have been printed
by now, the lack of your ability to find one doesn't mean he hasn't been corrected
by evans.
**************
>>Though many are counting on this, it is simply
not true. I live in DC and I've spoken with and know several congressmen. They understand
plenty.
Please let us know which congressmen you have spoken so that we can validate
your statement.
****************************
well guess what? i sleep with the
entire fuckin' house of representatives and once they're done gettin' off they get
a little chatty. turns out, they openly admitted to me that they don't know JACK
SHIT about any of this, but they're damn proud about how they're able to come off
as though they wrote the fuckin' book on ICANN.
****************************
>>Again,
your statements are unfounded and without merit. Pure speculation to support your
position, which is riddled with holes.
**********************
YOUR arguements,
however, are leakproof.
i wish you could see how hard i'm rolling my eyes right
now.
and for that matter, how do we even know that letter is real? huh? maybe this
is just another conspiracy like that area 5 thing?
how do you know?
**********************
Please
explain how you know that he "knows all of Jack about politics" simply by his posting
of Rep Tauzin's letter? ... and please, let us know who you are so that we can fully
understand your position. You must be very well connected to know what Tauzin is
doing in such detail.
*********************
i see you have problems with basic
intuition as well. because he posted the letter as a retort to slicer's original
analysis as though he were relying on the letter as his arguement, (here comes the
intuition...) he must have believed everything in the letter to be correct. because
of this naiviety, he knows all of jack about politics.
seems you're floatin' in
the same boat.
as for knowing more politicians and YOUR credibility, look for the
sarcasm in my sig.
*******************
>>Regards,
Chris Grady
President
Vieodata,
Inc.
******************
Regards,
Jesus, and a little pissed off
King of
Heaven