Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Mon, September 10, 2001 at 10:22 PM GMT (Mon, September 10, 2001 at 3:22 PM PDT)
||Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
||Garry Anderson's nightmare! ROFLMAOLOL.
Garry objected to my proposal for logical CCTLD's on the basis of expense.
Now the ISO is forcing a change to Great Britain's CCTLD.|
UK, not GB, was the ISO
abbreviation CCTLD for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Now it's GB. So all the British websites ending in .uk will be forced to change
to .gb at great expense [just like Zaire sites .zr were forced to change to Democratic
Congo sites .cd].
So the expense is NOT an excuse to keep CCTLD's two letters [insufficient
number of letters for unique sensical abbreviations].
Therefor, let's change every
two-letter CCTLD to three letters [to allow for unique sensical abbreviations].
Have a ten-year phase-in where both the two-letter and three-letter CCTLD would point
to the exact same namespace. This would reduce the expense of conversion and
increase the logic of the CCTLD's.