Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
DomeBase |
Date/Time: |
Sat, September 15, 2001 at 4:09 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows NT 5.0 |
Subject: |
One of the registrars is asking to have Land Rush delayed for undefined period of time |
Message: |
|
A registrar in New York is asking to have the Land Rush period delayed for an undefined
period of time. I am sympathetic, but remember how the thousands of Land Rush
pre-registrants pleaded with Afilias to act on the Sunrise frauds (such as adopting
the DomeBase Proposal) before Land Rush? Afilias ignored them and they were
cheated out of the vast majority of their Land Rush pre-registration fees. I have
heard that many of them have resigned themselves to working with whatever pickings
are left over after the cheats have eaten as much as they want. If the Land
Rush is delayed/cancelled now, they will be cheated again. (To say nothing
of SOME of the registrars who are acting like vultures -- charging for names that
are not available...tacking on new charges every minute, etc.). If any action
is taken, action MUST include full adoption of the DomeBase proposal. I have worked
and worked and tried and tried to publicize and encourage the adoption of a solution
which would have benefited everyone. It has been very frustrating to see injustice
compound injustice. I don't know what is more amazing -- the fact that Afilias
has not taken action to redeem the Land Rush or the fact that one person outside
Afilias who could probably have implemented the DomeBase Proposal told me "It is
all BS." That person wanted nothing to stop the Land Rush from happening on
schedule. Well, what now?
|
| |
Link: |
DomeBase Proposal |
Message Thread:
- One of the registrars is asking to have Land Rush delayed for undefined period of time DomeBase, September 15 @ 4:09 PM (3/18)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy