Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Sun, September 16, 2001 at 3:02 PM GMT
||Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Yes, I experienced the same
problem in attempting to confirm with the Neulevel Registry. But, let's not
get too carried away, they have had only 9+ months to make this operable. I
am sure these glitches must be for our own protection and just another reason we
should be thankful for the reserved approach in TLD expansion. I have seen very little
go right with these new registries and somehow this has been made to justify the
means. Twisted logic.
Here is the message I received:
Error 404--Not Found
From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of
whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
If the server does not wish to
make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can
be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through
some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable
and has no forwarding address.