Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Anion
Date/Time:	Sun, September 16, 2001 at 10:36 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	incorrect (once again)
Message:
The second que will generate little or no revenues for Afilias. By postponing the deadline for the first que afilias can keep registrants bidding and competing for the few good names remaining. The longer the competition for these names continues the more money Afilias will make.

Message Thread:

• Afilias trying to exploit the tradgedy — Anion, September 16 @ 9:38 PM (2/9)
• WRONG! Consider customers in New York City. — InternetAdvocate, September 16 @ 10:09 PM (1/7)
• Incorrect — Anion, September 16 @ 10:11 PM (1/6)
• STILL WRONG? — InternetAdvocate, September 16 @ 10:24 PM (1/5)
• incorrect (once again) — Anion, September 16 @ 10:36 PM (1/4)
• Again UR still wrong! — InternetAdvocate, September 16 @ 10:52 PM (2/3)
• Logical error — Anion, September 18 @ 2:19 AM (1/1)
• Maybe. Maybe Not. — InternetAdvocate, September 18 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)
• I'm not as cynical as you. However I also have doubts about Afilias. — InternetAdvocate, September 16 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
• I would hope that is not the case. — Elvis, September 16 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy