Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	challenge
Date/Time:	Sat, September 22, 2001 at 11:22 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	You still believe Afilias ??????
Message:
Nothing they said and not a date they set, ever panned out. Why you belive this might have changed is beyond me? Along with all their obvious short comings they have serious technical limitations as well. They will most definetly bungle the Landrush as well and they will extend, stretch, re-run, back-date, their process as long as they see fit. I know we are all tired and cynical but this whole fiasco is a long long way from being over...

Message Thread:

• Are any of those .info domains actually resolving yet??? — dtobias, September 22 @ 8:15 PM (1/10)
• I couldn't find any that resolved either. (EOM) — sfeibish, September 22 @ 10:07 PM (1/9)
• You still believe Afilias ?????? — challenge, September 22 @ 11:22 PM (1/8)
• Makes sense — onmove, September 23 @ 3:06 AM (1/7)
• you guys have summed up my feelings  - tired, cynical, sad — antipodes, September 23 @ 4:36 AM (2/6)
• Dear Antipodes — DomeBase, September 23 @ 1:30 PM (1/1)
• BIG thanks DomeBase — antipodes, September 23 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
• ditto — mole, September 23 @ 5:43 AM (1/3)
• At stake is the credilbility of legacy DNS — onmove, September 23 @ 6:32 AM (1/2)
• Here is what I wrote for ICANN over a month ago — DomeBase, September 23 @ 1:08 PM (1/1)
• Robert, I would have thought that you had put enough in that — antipodes, September 23 @ 1:26 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy