Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	challenge
Date/Time:	Sun, September 30, 2001 at 7:36 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	That's not the point
Message:
The date is the problem. Did they extend the Landrush processing dates while they were actually processing the names or do they routinely backdate registrations to some date that fits with something else.. Either way, I have a huge problem with what they are doing.

Message Thread:

• My worst fears — challenge, September 30 @ 7:16 PM (2/12)
• no, that's consistent with what they've done all along — infowatcher, September 30 @ 7:47 PM (2/6)
• Dear Infowatcher, please respond — DomeBase, September 30 @ 8:29 PM (1/2)
• gotta ask afilias that! — infowatcher, September 30 @ 9:23 PM (1/1)
• If date is submission date, then what is explanation for this? — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
• Even worse — challenge, September 30 @ 7:50 PM (2/2)
• Duh That's not what it means — fred48, September 30 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
• that's wrong too... — infowatcher, September 30 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
• test run? — crs, September 30 @ 7:32 PM (2/4)
• That's not the point — challenge, September 30 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)
• test — crs, September 30 @ 7:36 PM (1/2)
• what do you mean by test? — challenge, September 30 @ 7:39 PM (1/1)
• re: test — crs, September 30 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy