Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	infowatcher
Date/Time:	Sun, September 30, 2001 at 7:47 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	no, that's consistent with what they've done all along
Message:
starting from sunrise, afilias has published awarded dates based on when the applications were sent to the registry - nothing suspicious here, just different from what you expected. you're applying real-time behaviour expectations in com/net/org to a queue process, which doesn't work the same way.

Message Thread:

• My worst fears — challenge, September 30 @ 7:16 PM (2/12)
• no, that's consistent with what they've done all along — infowatcher, September 30 @ 7:47 PM (2/6)
• Dear Infowatcher, please respond — DomeBase, September 30 @ 8:29 PM (1/2)
• gotta ask afilias that! — infowatcher, September 30 @ 9:23 PM (1/1)
• If date is submission date, then what is explanation for this? — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
• Even worse — challenge, September 30 @ 7:50 PM (2/2)
• Duh That's not what it means — fred48, September 30 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
• that's wrong too... — infowatcher, September 30 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
• test run? — crs, September 30 @ 7:32 PM (2/4)
• That's not the point — challenge, September 30 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)
• test — crs, September 30 @ 7:36 PM (1/2)
• what do you mean by test? — challenge, September 30 @ 7:39 PM (1/1)
• re: test — crs, September 30 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy