Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: richy
Date/Time: Sun, September 30, 2001 at 9:55 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Subject: I can see that but...


Thanks Gary

That makes sense and could well be what's behind the date

But nevertheless,

(a) the actual registration date SHOULD be the day the name was granted (eg processed and actually registered)

(b) it's not acceptable to have an "end-date" that assumes a registration a fortnight BEFORE any of the names were actually processed

Two Years must mean two years - by the time these names are resolved, I'll have lost nearly 3 weeks on this basis

Haven't Afilias got the techical know-how to get their systems to record the ACTUAL registration date on their notoriously unreliable WHOIS details?

The "date-stamp" when some registrar sent in a list, is NOT the same as the date the name was actually registered (which could not possibly precede the randomised process)      


Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy