Thanks GaryThat makes sense and could well be what's behind the date
But nevertheless,
(a)
the actual registration date SHOULD be the day the name was granted (eg processed
and actually registered)
(b) it's not acceptable to have an "end-date" that assumes
a registration a fortnight BEFORE any of the names were actually processed
Two
Years must mean two years - by the time these names are resolved, I'll have lost
nearly 3 weeks on this basis
Haven't Afilias got the techical know-how to get their
systems to record the ACTUAL registration date on their notoriously unreliable WHOIS
details?
The "date-stamp" when some registrar sent in a list, is NOT the same as
the date the name was actually registered (which could not possibly precede the randomised
process)