Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	DomeBase
Date/Time:	Sun, September 30, 2001 at 10:41 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Thanks Dan.
Message:
That would be OK, I guess, as long as it was processed in the Land Rush round robin and not given priority like a Sunrise.  Jeepers, now people filling in bogus trademark information (TM # 00000, date 0200-01-01) on Land Rush registrations? I thought I had seen it all.  I will still keep on eye on this type of thing.

Message Thread:

• Sept 12 makes perfect sense — gckorn, September 30 @ 9:41 PM (4/16)
• This is obviously registrar error — kingCPA, September 30 @ 11:20 PM (1/2)
• Thanks King. — DomeBase, October 1 @ 12:41 AM (1/1)
• Registrar auto-fillins — kingCPA, October 1 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
• no rational justification : more unacceptable business practice? — richy, September 30 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
• But how about a September 12th Sunrise/Trademark Registration??? — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:06 PM (2/9)
• sunrise names were defined by date of submission — kingCPA, September 30 @ 10:24 PM (2/7)
• Another Sept. 12th registration with trademark data from diff. registrar! — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)
• Thanks King.  I appreciate the feedback.... — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:32 PM (1/5)
• Trademark fields — dtobias, September 30 @ 10:36 PM (1/4)
• Thanks Dan. — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:41 PM (3/3)
• Obviously Registrar Error — kingCPA, September 30 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)
• Dan, I found a second Sept. 12th registration with bogus TM data — DomeBase, September 30 @ 11:01 PM (0/0)
• i think this is registrar error — kingCPA, September 30 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)
• SUNRISE REGISTRATION ON SEPT. 12TH??  THIS COULD BE BIG. — DomeBase, September 30 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)
• I can see that but... — richy, September 30 @ 9:55 PM (1/1)
• One-Time Issue — gckorn, September 30 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy