Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	DomeBase
Date/Time:	Mon, October 1, 2001 at 1:28 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	If it turns out that these were treated as regular old Land Rush regs
Message:
then my hunch is that you are right and this is just some form of sloppiness (e.g. filling in TM fields with default information in Land Rush).  It is easy to get all worked up and begin thinking the worst rather than giving folks the benefit of the doubt.

Message Thread:

• figure this one out.. — jman, October 1 @ 12:35 AM (1/7)
• Hi Jman, thanks for sharing this.  Could be important. — DomeBase, October 1 @ 12:38 AM (2/6)
• Domebase, here's the info... — jman, October 1 @ 1:18 AM (2/2)
• You may be challenged by Afilias — bezzant, October 1 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
• Thanks.  Probably just strangeness.  I do wonder, however, what their — DomeBase, October 1 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)
• adds to the confusion — spot, October 1 @ 12:58 AM (1/2)
• yes it adds to the confusion — kingCPA, October 1 @ 1:08 AM (1/1)
• If it turns out that these were treated as regular old Land Rush regs — DomeBase, October 1 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy