Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Lottery Winner
Date/Time:	Thu, October 4, 2001 at 1:12 AM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Matching their dot coms or hoping to make $, not needed at all
Message:
New TLDs are not needed at all.

Message Thread:

• It's not that hard — Lottery Winner, October 3 @ 8:17 PM (2/21)
• Toll Free Prefixes...they illustrate the point you're making... — Ron_Bennett, October 3 @ 9:19 PM (2/4)
• Misuse of .com — dtobias, October 3 @ 9:43 PM (1/1)
• Blame the negligent registrars and not end users... — psbyowner, October 3 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)
• You wish — gunky, October 3 @ 9:28 PM (1/1)
• You are obviously high on .info — Lottery Winner, October 3 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)
• You miss the point — challenge, October 3 @ 8:35 PM (3/15)
• It would be interesting to see — Elvis, October 3 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
• Should the Fortune 500 move from .com to .biz ?? — Lottery Winner, October 3 @ 9:31 PM (3/12)
• And your point being? — challenge, October 3 @ 10:41 PM (2/8)
• point is: New TLDs foster confusion, dilution, and disputes. — Lottery Winner, October 3 @ 11:55 PM (1/6)
• moronic analysis — gunky, October 4 @ 12:45 AM (1/5)
• 350,000 domains so far say new TLDs ARE NEEDED — spot, October 4 @ 12:53 AM (1/4)
• Matching their dot coms or hoping to make $, not needed at all — Lottery Winner, October 4 @ 1:12 AM (1/3)
• I agree most aren't, except for INFO, here is why — challenge, October 4 @ 1:39 AM (1/2)
• Good Ideas - .info seems promising — Lottery Winner, October 4 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)
• Time will tell — challenge, October 4 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)
• Thats right — gunky, October 3 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
• Now you are getting a clue — gunky, October 3 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)
• We must establish the identity — Srana, October 3 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy