Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Fri, October 5, 2001 at 2:56 AM GMT (Thu, October 4, 2001 at 7:56 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Not kidding...
Message:
My idea makes sense.  My idea is for generics.  The non-generic sunrise and landrush registrations would stand as is.
Link:	The Solution to the Dot-Info Debacle is SO easy ...

Message Thread:

• The Solution to the Dot-Info Debacle is SO easy ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4 @ 11:56 PM (3/11)
• Why should landrusher's lose their generics just because of sunrise cybersquatters? — spot, October 5 @ 3:10 AM (3/3)
• Point Taken.  Here's a revision to the suggestion... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)
• you're "spot on" SPOT! — antipodes, October 5 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)
• agreed w/ spot. dont hurt the honest ones! eom — psbyowner, October 5 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)
• you must be kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — antipodes, October 5 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)
• Not kidding... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
• I hate to have to agree with you... — rachelmacgregor, October 5 @ 1:57 AM (2/4)
• I've changed my mind, I don't agree with you after all — rachelmacgregor, October 5 @ 8:50 PM (1/2)
• Rachel admits she loves crap. LOL.  She forgot her medication... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)
• Rachel's agreement very long, but her second post extra short.  What gives? — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
• What .info Needs — dtobias, October 5 @ 3:09 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy