Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Fri, October 5, 2001 at 8:49 PM GMT (Fri, October 5, 2001 at 1:49 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Point Taken.  Here's a revision to the suggestion...
Message:
Spot: "I spent hundreds of hours checking the whois and preregistering with multiple companies. It wouldn't be fair to lose the best of my bunch, just because of other people's false apps in sunrise." Point Taken.  Here's a revision to the suggestion... Exempt the Landrush generics from being voided. But void all Sunrise generics, whether or not trademark legit. Garry Anderson explained on several posts the reasons for not allowing trademark owners any monopolies on generic domains.
Link:	The Solution to the Dot-Info Debacle is SO easy ...

Message Thread:

• The Solution to the Dot-Info Debacle is SO easy ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4 @ 11:56 PM (3/11)
• Why should landrusher's lose their generics just because of sunrise cybersquatters? — spot, October 5 @ 3:10 AM (3/3)
• Point Taken.  Here's a revision to the suggestion... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)
• you're "spot on" SPOT! — antipodes, October 5 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)
• agreed w/ spot. dont hurt the honest ones! eom — psbyowner, October 5 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)
• you must be kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — antipodes, October 5 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)
• Not kidding... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
• I hate to have to agree with you... — rachelmacgregor, October 5 @ 1:57 AM (2/4)
• I've changed my mind, I don't agree with you after all — rachelmacgregor, October 5 @ 8:50 PM (1/2)
• Rachel admits she loves crap. LOL.  She forgot her medication... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)
• Rachel's agreement very long, but her second post extra short.  What gives? — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
• What .info Needs — dtobias, October 5 @ 3:09 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy