Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	antipodes
Date/Time:	Mon, October 8, 2001 at 12:04 AM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.74 using Windows 98
Subject:	clarification  - Sunrise fraud and Afilias's obligations to
Message:
Landrushers Sorry folks for the crap/misleading intro para to the above post of the same subject - the post is mine not Dave's. The post was written after Dave had replied to a question I put to him after he had posted that one insider's opinion was that the fiasco of the .info Sunrise was planned.  I asked him how good was his source and he replied that a staff member of a large registry felt from the behaviour of the registry management, the Sunrise cybersquatting was expected.  Sorry for the confusion.  Thanks Dave.

Message Thread:

• Sunrise fraud and Afilias's obligations to Landrushers — antipodes, October 8 @ 2:22 AM (4/7)
• clarification  - Sunrise fraud and Afilias's obligations to — antipodes, October 8 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
• Lack of .info from Afilias.info — DaveKing2, October 8 @ 9:29 AM (1/2)
• Afilias site screwed up — dtobias, October 8 @ 2:11 PM (1/1)
• Fixed now... — dtobias, October 8 @ 3:10 PM (0/0)
• Sunrise is bull* propaganda — Garry Anderson, October 8 @ 8:27 AM (0/0)
• The whois data incriminating registrars needs to be raised before a court of law — spot, October 8 @ 3:51 AM (1/1)
• some board members breached ICANN and Afilias registrar — antipodes, October 8 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy