Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	IncompetentAfilias
Date/Time:	Fri, October 19, 2001 at 6:16 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	No
Message:
I was merely stating my opinion that I feel a new TLD should start from scratch and not carry the 'baggage' of 10,000's of registrants when it joins the 'big leagues.'  These registrations also raise the question of abusing insider knowledge, as in New.net's case of various officials who seem to use their inside information to make timely registrations... Attack at will...

Message Thread:

• Image Online Design's application will be approved next year.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 10:50 PM (4/31)
• 'Next Round': 2005 I predict or 2008. — psbyowner, October 19 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
• If you don't need them... — cambler, October 19 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)
• Laf'ing at all your _UNBIASED_ opinions on .WEB... you all own .WEB domains or work for 'em :P  eom — IncompetentAfilias, October 18 @ 8:01 PM (1/13)
• No... — cambler, October 18 @ 8:24 PM (2/12)
• - Mr. Cambler - — IncompetentAfilias, October 19 @ 1:18 AM (2/10)
• I am making predictions on Image Online Design's future based on fact..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 2:03 AM (2/7)
• Opportunist — S. Hudgens, October 19 @ 1:45 PM (1/4)
• No — IncompetentAfilias, October 19 @ 6:16 PM (1/3)
• You're right — cambler, October 19 @ 6:24 PM (1/2)
• Re: Perfect World — IncompetentAfilias, October 20 @ 7:38 AM (1/1)
• dropped domains — cambler, October 20 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)
• Agreed, New.Net supporters are the real weasels... bar 'em at the doors! ;)  eom — IncompetentAfilias, October 19 @ 3:58 AM (1/1)
• Master of all domains... and that includes yours ...whahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaeom — mole, October 19 @ 5:46 AM (0/0)
• That's "Ambler" :-) — cambler, October 19 @ 1:35 AM (1/1)
• Thanks for the reply... Agreed it's probably hard to work out the bugs without Customers heh.....eom — IncompetentAfilias, October 19 @ 4:01 AM (0/0)
• welcome Cambler — DomeBase, October 18 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)
• I couldn't agree more! — kodo, October 18 @ 2:21 AM (0/0)
• Well, You May Be Right , But ... — GettingScrewed, October 18 @ 1:04 AM (3/13)
• Another suggestion about IOD — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
• I think the board knows...Nonetheless good point!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18 @ 2:26 AM (1/2)
• Sorry, But The Directors Are Really In The Dark About The .INFO Debacle ... — GettingScrewed, October 18 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)
• well it's time ICANN's directors addressed the issues that — antipodes, October 18 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
• IOD — InternetAdvocate, October 18 @ 1:38 AM (1/8)
• web.com?!? — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 1:28 PM (1/7)
• Using web.com — cambler, October 18 @ 5:55 PM (1/6)
• Using web.com — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 3:29 AM (1/5)
• I still don't get it — cambler, October 19 @ 5:02 AM (1/4)
• Try this... — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 11:04 PM (1/3)
• Sure... — cambler, October 20 @ 12:47 AM (1/2)
• Here's the value ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 11:51 PM (1/1)
• No value at all — cambler, October 22 @ 3:20 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy