Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Sun, October 21, 2001 at 10:57 PM GMT (Sun, October 21, 2001 at 3:57 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	You're welcome, ...
Message:
fricking-asshole-jerkoff-dork! If you can't use words correctly, then don't post here, or at least don't piss on those who insist on correct usage of language.  [Oh, I forgot! You enjoy pissing into the wind at others.] Or do you really think that ICANN will treat seriously your comments containing incorrect grammar or obscene words?  Rachel learned that lesson from other posters' comments about her foul-worded posts. Only time will tell if you ever learn it too.

Message Thread:

• Reversed Domain Hijacking: The rules — spot, October 19 @ 7:29 PM (2/27)
• What flipping rules? — Garry Anderson, October 20 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
• answers — DaveKing2, October 19 @ 11:59 PM (2/25)
• landrush registrations — onmove, October 20 @ 8:05 PM (1/19)
• I don't see it... — cambler, October 20 @ 9:05 PM (1/18)
• Please consider this....... — onmove, October 20 @ 9:48 PM (1/17)
• I don't think so — cambler, October 20 @ 9:59 PM (1/16)
• What gives people the right to own the Internet? — rachelmacgregor, October 20 @ 10:20 PM (3/15)
• Agreed! — DaveKing2, October 21 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
• All common dictionary words shouldn't have been claimable in the Sunrise process at all ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
• Bruce Springsteen - new TLD — Garry Anderson, October 21 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
• Good points... — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
• Big Business has no right to annex the Internet — rachelmacgregor, October 20 @ 10:54 PM (2/10)
• Re: Big Business has no right to annex the Internet. — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 11:46 PM (0/0)
• "The Internet Parliament" to govern ICANN — rachelmacgregor, October 20 @ 11:07 PM (2/8)
• Won't work — cambler, October 20 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)
• Your 'Internet Parliament' idea is dangerous ... — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 11:33 PM (1/6)
• Ending ICANN's Autonomy — rachelmacgregor, October 21 @ 12:00 AM (3/5)
• Rebuttals Galore... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
• dubious — richard_henderson, October 21 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)
• If you want some control of ICANN — Garry Anderson, October 21 @ 12:09 AM (1/2)
• Really? — cambler, October 21 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)
• No - I just made it up ;-) — Garry Anderson, October 21 @ 1:36 AM (0/0)
• This is mostly based on Trade Marks... — psbyowner, October 20 @ 6:03 PM (2/4)
• If ICANN is accountable to the US Government, to which office are complaints to be sent? — spot, October 21 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
• Duh. Precedents. — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/2)
• thanks for the correction — psbyowner, October 21 @ 3:50 PM (1/1)
• You're welcome, ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy