Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
InternetAdvocate |
| Date/Time: |
Sun, October 21, 2001 at 11:51 PM GMT (Sun, October 21, 2001 at 4:51 PM PDT) |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0 |
| Subject: |
Here's the value ... |
Message: |
|
|
"I just don't see the value here. If our customers really want their .web names to
resolve, they can ask that we place them under webtld.com (instead of web.com). That's
only 3 more letters. So foo.web would be foo.webtld.com (instead of foo.web.com)." Oh,
I thought you were referring to foo.web.webtld.com [quite cumbersome]. But foo.webtld.com
would be as valuable as foo.shop.new.net [in that main root viewers would only need
append 'tld.com' to see a foo.web domain, like they'd append '.new.net' to see a
foo.shop domain]. However, foo.web.net would be more valuable, because main root
viewers would only need append '.net' to see a foo.web domain, less cumbersome and
less confusing. Remember: KISS [Keep It Simple for Stupids].
|
|
|
Message Thread:
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy