Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Mon, October 22, 2001 at 12:22 AM GMT (Sun, October 21, 2001 at 5:22 PM PDT)
||Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
||I understood your point ...
"Since our goal has been, since day one, to run a TLD registry, if your proposal
has utility, the 2nd level .com that we would put it under should be irrelevant."|
the link below.
"Otherwise, it just sounds like you're trying to convince IOD to
spend a lot of money on web.com and then spend even more money and time dealing with
collisions. That's not a productive use of either."
What collisions? There
will be no collisions, unless ICANN awards dot-web to an IOD competitor.
everything under web.com makes sense because it provides resolution services, then
putting it under webtld.com should make just as much sense."
Depends. See the link
||Here's the value ...