Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: InternetAdvocate
Date/Time: Mon, October 22, 2001 at 12:22 AM GMT (Sun, October 21, 2001 at 5:22 PM PDT)
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject: I understood your point ...


"Since our goal has been, since day one, to run a TLD registry, if your proposal has utility, the 2nd level .com that we would put it under should be irrelevant."

See the link below.

"Otherwise, it just sounds like you're trying to convince IOD to spend a lot of money on and then spend even more money and time dealing with collisions. That's not a productive use of either."

What collisions?  There will be no collisions, unless ICANN awards dot-web to an IOD competitor.

"If putting everything under makes sense because it provides resolution services, then putting it under should make just as much sense."

Depends. See the link below.


Link: Here's the value ...

Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy