Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Mon, October 22, 2001 at 12:45 AM GMT (Sun, October 21, 2001 at 5:45 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Oops.
Message:
Cambler wrote: "Otherwise, it just sounds like you're trying to convince IOD to spend a lot of money on web.com and then spend even more money and time dealing with collisions. That's not a productive use of either." Then I wrote: 'What collisions?  There will be no collisions, unless ICANN awards dot-web to an IOD competitor.' Oops, I forgot about web.com collisions.  That's because I was thinking about web.net instead. I admit that web.net is a much better deal than web.com - precisely because of such collisions [and expense of buying them out]. Web.com has many subdomains that would collide with .web domains.  But web.net does not.

Message Thread:

• Image Online Design — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 3:31 PM (6/36)
• IOD should buy web.net's domain name ... — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 4:18 AM (1/4)
• Duh. — S. Hudgens, October 19 @ 1:50 PM (1/3)
• No Duh! — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 10:44 PM (1/2)
• Response. — S. Hudgens, October 20 @ 2:59 AM (1/1)
• Rebuttal ... — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
• IOD should buy web.com ... — InternetAdvocate, October 18 @ 1:31 AM (1/10)
• Are you on drugs? — kodo, October 18 @ 2:24 AM (2/9)
• You think New.Net is on drugs too? — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 3:45 AM (1/7)
• I don't see it — cambler, October 19 @ 4:59 AM (1/6)
• LOL. — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 11:09 PM (1/5)
• I think you miss my point — cambler, October 20 @ 12:50 AM (1/4)
• I understood your point ... — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:22 AM (2/3)
• Oops. — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)
• I admit that web.net is a much better deal than web.com — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)
• No, thanks — cambler, October 22 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
• COMPETITION with .com? — Garry Anderson, October 18 @ 8:24 AM (0/0)
• keep in mind what business ICANN is in.....   .com — stuart, October 17 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
• ummm... I wanted media.web but its taken, can I get it if IOD become the .web registrar? eom — mole, October 17 @ 6:01 PM (3/10)
• Me too — cambler, October 18 @ 6:57 AM (0/0)
• Well I wanted rockport.info — kodo, October 18 @ 2:28 AM (2/7)
• City names — Garry Anderson, October 18 @ 8:30 AM (0/0)
• Question is, do I have a fair chance to media.web if IOD becomes the .web ICANN registrar? — mole, October 18 @ 3:41 AM (1/5)
• Fair chance? — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 1:22 PM (1/4)
• Touche! This is the very reason why 20,000 premium secured .web domains is premafreezing IOD..eom — mole, October 18 @ 6:55 PM (1/3)
• IOD is the .WEB choice! — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 7:52 PM (1/2)
• My dear Mr. Hudgens, — mole, October 18 @ 8:10 PM (1/1)
• I know... — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
• Why didn't you register it before someone else did? — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
• Afilias : "This sham of a company" — rachelmacgregor, October 17 @ 4:26 PM (0/0)
• ICANN will use the .info and .biz failures to justify inaction — Anion, October 17 @ 3:43 PM (2/6)
• IOD can and will do it! — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)
• I agree... this is the end of new tld launches except what's owed — mole, October 17 @ 3:54 PM (1/4)
• Political Pressure — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 4:08 PM (1/3)
• DoC is Department of Chickens — Garry Anderson, October 17 @ 6:07 PM (1/2)
• DoC is Department of Corruptoids — InternetAdvocate, October 18 @ 1:55 AM (1/1)
• And thank you for your support — Garry Anderson, October 18 @ 8:40 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy