Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: InternetAdvocate
Date/Time: Mon, October 22, 2001 at 12:45 AM GMT (Sun, October 21, 2001 at 5:45 PM PDT)
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject: Oops.

Message:
 

 
Cambler wrote: "Otherwise, it just sounds like you're trying to convince IOD to spend a lot of money on web.com and then spend even more money and time dealing with collisions. That's not a productive use of either."

Then I wrote: 'What collisions?  There will be no collisions, unless ICANN awards dot-web to an IOD competitor.'

Oops, I forgot about web.com collisions.  That's because I was thinking about web.net instead.

I admit that web.net is a much better deal than web.com - precisely because of such collisions [and expense of buying them out].

Web.com has many subdomains that would collide with .web domains.  But web.net does not.

 


Message Thread: