Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Tue, October 23, 2001 at 2:25 AM GMT (Mon, October 22, 2001 at 7:25 PM PDT)
||Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
||IOD subthread CONTINUED ...
web.com?!? S. Hudgens
I still don't get it cambler
Try this... InternetAdvocate
Here's the value ... InternetAdvocate
No value at all
Cambler ["No value at all"] wrote:
"If we sold 3rd-level domains,
perhaps. But we don't. Indeed, web.com has this business model, and they're not doing
so hot as far as I can tell."
But web.com does not have IOD's resources, and IOD's
alt-root subscriber base. And IOD might be able to obtain web.net's domain
name for far less than web.com without web.com conflicts with .web domains.
ICANN denies IOD's .web ap or significantly delays it, then IOD's clients would benefit
from the ability of mainroot viewers to view their websites by appending .net to
their .web domain name. That is the reason I suggested that IOD buy web.net's
This would be a moot point if ICANN approves IOD's ap for .web within six