Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Gregory W. Krajewski
Date/Time:	Tue, October 23, 2001 at 3:22 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	New.net has raised the bar????   Give me a break!!!!
Message:
Your proof you offer: >>>>>Things that would likely appear on the check-list. 1. Affiliate Program  2. Registrar Interface 3. Message Board 4. ISP Participation with >50,000,000 Subscribers<<<<<< This checklist you offer tells me Jim, you haven't the slightest idea what you are talking about when it comes to the Domain Name System.  Frankly, I am shocked to say the least...Yes, New.net has made a name for itself.  Yes, they sell names that can be seen if you have an account with the likes of NetZero, and Earthlink...If you don't they you can use their plug-in (version???)....The "message board"----Good one!! I see you are trying to sell the "real biz"....How is this helpful??? I mean really??  At least with Image Online Design, they are upfront in what they have offered, a "proof-of-concept" dot web registry.  Their "proof-of-concept" has show ICANN (and IANA) that they are A) responsible B) worthy of inclusion in the legacy root and C) working with the internet community... I don't see new.net doing this...Their idea of community is only those who accept their "Idea of how the internet should be"...I myself have been banned several times on their "message" board for speaking my mind.  I was informed that is not acceptable...That if I want to point out weak spots, that I could go somewhere else....Well, here I am...prove me wrong about New.net and I will listen....Oh, please do back up your comments....

Message Thread:

• What else can we do? — cambler, October 22 @ 3:54 AM (7/51)
• It Sounds Like the .WEB IPv4 Proof-of-Concept Testing is Going Well... — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 5:19 PM (1/20)
• I'm not sure I follow — cambler, October 23 @ 5:51 PM (1/19)
• Does .WEB have IPv6 Servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 6:20 PM (1/18)
• Servers — cambler, October 23 @ 8:41 PM (2/17)
• Regarding 3D and the 2D WEB-centric World — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 9:41 PM (2/15)
• Recollection — S. Hudgens, October 24 @ 2:22 AM (1/6)
• 1D, 2D, 3D — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 3:28 AM (1/5)
• Last post on this weirdness. — S. Hudgens, October 24 @ 2:18 PM (1/4)
• "let us concentrate on issues that affect us all" — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 2:56 PM (1/3)
• Your comments — hiltonian, October 24 @ 3:35 PM (1/2)
• "let us concentrate on issues that affect us all" — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)
• If you don't know that, why are you posting here? EOM — hiltonian, October 24 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
• I've read it — cambler, October 23 @ 10:04 PM (1/7)
• OK, You have read it, did you learn anything from it ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 10:43 PM (2/6)
• Because. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
• Jim, I suggest you "beam" yourself back to the New.net ship....... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 23 @ 11:20 PM (1/4)
• .BIZ is still in the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 12:23 AM (1/3)
• Yes, and... — cambler, October 24 @ 3:04 AM (1/2)
• What Phase is .WEB in ? — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)
• phase — cambler, October 24 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)
• Do you Mean Deployed or Implemented ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
• Did IOD get WEB.INFO ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)
• No, it was taken by Afilias — cambler, October 23 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
• Clarify ... — InternetAdvocate, October 23 @ 1:23 AM (1/1)
• Yes, correct — cambler, October 23 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)
• New.Net Has Raised the Bar — Jim Fleming, October 22 @ 11:01 PM (2/20)
• New.net has raised the bar????   Give me a break!!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 23 @ 3:22 AM (1/17)
• Get a life! New.net is the best alternative solution to all this crooked mess...eom — mole, October 23 @ 9:40 AM (3/16)
• New.net Is Getting To Be A Joke ... — GettingScrewed, October 23 @ 8:36 PM (1/1)
• Yeah, except there's no punch line (unless you are the 1% who has a plug in) eom — spot, October 23 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
• I agree with Greg — Garry Anderson, October 23 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)
• New.Net is working on .MOVIE — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 3:30 PM (1/12)
• New.Net — S. Hudgens, October 23 @ 3:57 PM (1/11)
• Do you think ICANN has 100% Visibility ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 5:07 PM (1/10)
• ICANN — S. Hudgens, October 23 @ 6:23 PM (1/9)
• "visibility" is all that matters ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 6:51 PM (1/8)
• Yes. — S. Hudgens, October 23 @ 9:16 PM (1/7)
• There is More to the DNS than Web Sites — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 9:20 PM (1/6)
• Wow. — S. Hudgens, October 24 @ 1:57 AM (1/5)
• It all boils down to fairness. — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 2:05 AM (1/4)
• well.. — cambler, October 24 @ 3:05 AM (1/3)
• Are You Sure Your Comments Are Correct ? — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 3:16 AM (2/2)
• Jim, The Enterprise just called - You're due back from your 'away' mission... — IncompetentAfilias, October 24 @ 4:40 AM (0/0)
• comments — cambler, October 24 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
• good ideas... — cambler, October 23 @ 1:13 AM (1/1)
• Alternate Root or No Root ? — Jim Fleming, October 23 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
• E6.2 - You have blown it ;-) — Garry Anderson, October 22 @ 8:50 PM (1/1)
• Sure — cambler, October 22 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
• 0:253     WEB — Jim Fleming, October 22 @ 11:57 AM (0/0)
• Links? — IncompetentAfilias, October 22 @ 6:39 AM (1/1)
• Link — S. Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:16 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy