Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	S. Hudgens
Date/Time:	Wed, October 24, 2001 at 2:32 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Challenge - Image Online Design & .WEB
Message:
During the first round selection process, this board was alive with posts for and against the various TLD applicants.  Mostly, though, this board was filled with pro-IOD posts.  There were also many anti-IOD posts, but these posters seemed to struggle with the idea of actually backing up their 'thoughts' with facts. So, I issue a challenge to anyone who thinks they have a good reason why Image Online Design's .WEB application shouldn't be approved.  In the interest of accuracy, please do not just post drivel.  Rather, if you have facts that back up your claim, then this is a good time to present them. This is also a good time to present support for IOD (substantiated with facts, of course). Shelby Hudgens

Message Thread:

• Challenge - Image Online Design & .WEB — S. Hudgens, October 24 @ 2:32 PM (2/11)
• I support IOD. — S. Hudgens, October 24 @ 6:04 PM (1/3)
• How many .WEB SLD names are registered ? — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 7:33 PM (1/2)
• Wow... — cambler, October 24 @ 7:56 PM (1/1)
• Has .WEB completed all of the ICANN Proof-of-Concept Reports ? — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
• .WEB TLD Server IPv4 Proof-of-Concept Net Search Results — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (1/6)
• Yes, but... — hiltonian, October 24 @ 3:49 PM (1/5)
• People asked for facts....those are facts.... — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 4:04 PM (1/4)
• semantics — cambler, October 24 @ 4:24 PM (2/3)
• If .WEB is in Full Deployment, it does not need ICANN — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
• 14 RSCs Surveyed.....How Many of Them Match ? — Jim Fleming, October 24 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
• who cares? — cambler, October 24 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy