Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Jim Fleming
Date/Time:	Fri, October 26, 2001 at 1:05 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	It should be clear now why .WEB was not added.
Message:
It should be clear now why .WEB was not added. .WEB was too advanced for the ICANN Proof-of-Concept tests. .WEB would have been operational a year ago, with very few conflicts. There is no money in no conflicts. Also, .WEB would have shown the world how easy it is to smoothly add TLDs. Most people have been dupped into thinking it is a big deal that requires lots of staff and meetings held around the world. .WEB would not have required any of that.
Link:	www.IN-ADDR.INFO

Message Thread:

• What if ICANN denies IOD's .web ap or significantly delays it??? — InternetAdvocate, October 25 @ 11:06 PM (2/6)
• It seems to have been delayed for over 5 years already ... — cgrady, October 26 @ 12:33 AM (2/3)
• It should be clear now why .WEB was not added. — Jim Fleming, October 26 @ 1:05 AM (1/1)
• A decent argument tagged to SPAM ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)
• More reason why IOD should buy web.net domain ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)
• ICANN Accepted IOD's .WEB Application... — Jim Fleming, October 25 @ 11:29 PM (1/1)
• I meant Approval of the TLD... — InternetAdvocate, October 25 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy