Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	challenge
Date/Time:	Fri, October 26, 2001 at 3:19 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	One more thing (my last post on this topic)
Message:
I have no problems with your assertion that IOD's technical merits are far superior to others. I have no doubts that Afilias for one has done a horrendous job of launching .INFO. If anything had IOD been awarded an extension on its technical merits could have been a great thing for all of us however that was then and this is now.

Message Thread:

• My Response to Challenge's questions..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 11:01 PM (2/27)
• You guys (IODits) still don't get it.. — challenge, October 26 @ 1:16 AM (3/15)
• Know thyself, I tell you again. — cello, October 26 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
• Personal attacks...the last resort of the desperate. — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 2:25 AM (1/9)
• Those honorable intentions — challenge, October 26 @ 2:59 AM (3/8)
• Good Morning! — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)
• ahem.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 3:36 AM (2/4)
• (Off-topic) Real Names and getting personal — challenge, October 26 @ 11:50 AM (2/2)
• Getting personal — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
• How noble. — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
• True names — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 10:50 AM (0/0)
• One more thing (my last post on this topic) — challenge, October 26 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)
• Amen... — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 1:52 PM (0/0)
• unofficial? (long) — cambler, October 26 @ 1:32 AM (2/3)
• Creation of new TLDs — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
• IOD's dot-web will offer competition, but ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)
• Fine! — cambler, October 26 @ 2:16 AM (0/0)
• .BIZ competes against .COM — Jim Fleming, October 25 @ 11:08 PM (1/10)
• Not quite! Only somewhat... — InternetAdvocate, October 25 @ 11:17 PM (1/9)
• I agree — cgrady, October 26 @ 12:01 AM (1/8)
• A 'completely different ball park.' Sticky rather than sleezy! ROFLOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 12:21 AM (2/7)
• :-) No really ... — cgrady, October 26 @ 12:54 AM (1/1)
• Yes, really ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
• .WWW vs .WEB — Jim Fleming, October 26 @ 12:29 AM (2/4)
• No www needed with .web — cambler, October 26 @ 1:13 AM (1/1)
• Cute... — InternetAdvocate, October 28 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)
• I say: www should be prefix, not suffix. — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 12:50 AM (1/1)
• I agree — cgrady, October 26 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy