Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	S. Hudgens
Date/Time:	Fri, October 26, 2001 at 7:03 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Fairness
Message:
You offer some interesting ideas.  I do see some danger in them, though.  Specifically, while it seems easy to define 'developed', it might not actually be so easy to implement.  Who determines which sites are developed and which aren't? I don't know if you are a fan of UDRP, but your proposals would appear, on the surface at least, to open the doors for another even more subjective ruling body to come into existence. If there weren't this artificial scarcity of domain names, then speculation would, I think, be reduced.  Perhaps dramatically. Shelby Hudgens

Message Thread:

• Realistic expectations and a .INFO valuation model — challenge, October 26 @ 3:37 PM (2/29)
• .INFO — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
• Quite Right — richard_henderson, October 26 @ 5:14 PM (2/27)
• .info is a boon...... — onmove, October 26 @ 7:53 PM (3/7)
• You just described the use of every TLD on the planet .... — cgrady, October 26 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
• kindred spirits - I am in agreement with above posters - but — antipodes, October 26 @ 10:30 PM (1/1)
• I have not forgotten about the appalling arse they made on purpose — spot, October 26 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)
• I agree! — cambler, October 26 @ 8:01 PM (1/3)
• How many more TLDs would you like to see added to the root? As many as new.net are pushing for? — spot, October 26 @ 10:59 PM (1/2)
• How many? — cambler, October 27 @ 1:16 AM (1/1)
• Yes, I agree with the 1 apiece recommendation, and that is my main grumble with new.net — spot, October 27 @ 3:02 AM (0/0)
• The argument for fairness — challenge, October 26 @ 6:23 PM (1/18)
• Fairness — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 7:03 PM (1/17)
• Logic — challenge, October 26 @ 8:08 PM (1/16)
• Overlap — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 8:58 PM (2/15)
• I Agree! NO OVERLAP! — Timberstone, October 27 @ 5:33 AM (0/0)
• Overlap — cambler, October 26 @ 9:10 PM (1/13)
• Yes. — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 9:36 PM (1/12)
• Overlap — challenge, October 26 @ 11:28 PM (2/11)
• Overlap is irrelevant — cgrady, October 27 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)
• Banging heads — cambler, October 27 @ 1:20 AM (2/9)
• urr... — InternetAdvocate, October 28 @ 10:01 PM (1/1)
• Shows you how long ago I left LA! — cambler, October 29 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)
• Wrong again — challenge, October 27 @ 4:29 PM (3/6)
• Don't belong? — cambler, October 27 @ 6:08 PM (1/1)
• TLDs selected in November 2000 — Jim Fleming, October 27 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
• No overlap = monopoly — cgrady, October 27 @ 5:46 PM (1/2)
• Monopolistic... — InternetAdvocate, October 28 @ 10:04 PM (1/1)
• You're right — cambler, October 29 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)
• Where should .WEB people be ? — Jim Fleming, October 27 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy