Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Sun, October 28, 2001 at 10:34 PM GMT (Sun, October 28, 2001 at 3:34 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	I support placing IOD's Dot-Web into A-root...
Message:
but it still is not as good as dot-net is. Many dot-net domains don't sound good in dot-web.  For example: 1. hotel.web  -- who wants a sticky hotel, yuck!  2. motel.web  -- ditto 3. bank.web  --- ditto Of course, some dot-web domains may make sense. Continued at the link below...
Link:	Dot-net is better than dot-web ...

Message Thread:

• Dot-net is better than dot-web ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 12:45 AM (3/15)
• Some facts..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 1:57 AM (1/3)
• Net means network.  Not necessarily an internet infrastructure company either. — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 2:05 AM (1/2)
• Agree to Disagee....Let's try it! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 2:46 AM (1/1)
• I support placing IOD's Dot-Web into A-root... — InternetAdvocate, October 28 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)
• Agree. — spot, October 26 @ 1:17 AM (3/8)
• TLDs — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)
• Spot almost spot on ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
• Thanks — cambler, October 26 @ 1:20 AM (2/5)
• ICANN not a policy or regulatory body? — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 6:10 PM (1/3)
• How so? — cambler, October 26 @ 6:48 PM (1/2)
• They make policy and regulate — Garry Anderson, October 27 @ 8:39 AM (1/1)
• Sure — cambler, October 27 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
• Didn't mean to offend, buddy. — spot, October 26 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
• Reference — cgrady, October 26 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)
• I stand by my original post. — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy