Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Mon, October 29, 2001 at 12:43 AM GMT (Sun, October 28, 2001 at 5:43 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Proof-of-Concept = Implementation Phase [defacto], so don't let Fleming scare U about your domains.
Message:
Why mention Proof-of-Concept Phase at all? Fleming's posts earlier mentioning ICANN's Proof-of-Concept phase implied that ICANN might REVOKE the registries' mainroot Registry status [thus converting them into alt root registries] and that ICANN might select a different company to be Registry. That post also implied that the new TLD domain-holders risk losing their domains.   Not so. Why mention ICANN's Proof-of-Concept Phase at all?  Only to scare folks away from ICANN's new TLD's [and into Fleming's schemes].
Link:	ICANN's Proof of Concept term just a formality. ICANN will give final approval to Afilias & Neulevel

Message Thread:

• Proof-of-Concept = Implementation Phase [defacto], so don't let Fleming scare U about your domains. — InternetAdvocate, October 29 @ 12:43 AM (1/3)
• Check the top of the web-site...."proof of concept." — Jim Fleming, October 29 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)
• Proof of Concept really is Implementation [de facto] ... — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:00 AM (1/1)
• Proof of Concept is PRIOR to Implementation [de facto] — Garry Anderson, October 31 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy