Sure they can support their investments, but...

Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: EasyTech

Date/Time: Tue, October 30, 2001 at 4:15 PM GMT (Tue, October 30, 2001 at 5:15 PM CET)

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows 98

Subject: Sure they can support their investments, but...

Message:

if you know they are heavily invested you know that posts of them could be very wishful thinking or pushing.
I only say .WEB isn't that great as the guys with "vested interests" say.
There are many other "alt root registries". Why .WEB? Even name.space has more developped sites! .WEB is a thing that didn't fly for 6 years now!
Btw. I haven't seen "410" before. Everyone could think about it.

Link: http://namespace.org/links/ns100links.html

Message Thread:

The .WEB pusher — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:39 AM (3/39)

Thanks — cambler, October 30 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

Huh? — EasyTech, October 30 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

0:253 .WEB is in, all people have to do is develop it. — Jim Fleming, October 30 @ 11:46 AM (0/0)
Are you saying. . . — 410, October 30 @ 11:43 AM (2/35)

Sure they can support their investments, but... — EasyTech, October 30 @ 4:15 PM (3/28)

EasyTech: So what is your point?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
Um... — 410, October 30 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
Very poor argument — joinin, October 30 @ 4:32 PM (1/25)

not only .WEB — EasyTech, October 30 @ 6:27 PM (2/24)

Wrong Again EasyTech.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
Great! — cambler, October 30 @ 8:08 PM (2/22)

so what's your point? — EasyTech, October 30 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

My point — cambler, October 30 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)

More substance please, Mr. Ambler — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:23 PM (2/19)

Name.space Failed Because — GettingScrewed, October 31 @ 12:34 AM (1/4)

Dot-sucks sucks really bad... — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 12:40 AM (2/3)

Dot-not, dot-bad, dot-CON much better than dot-sucks [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)
.con or .bad? don't call us, we'll call you. NEXT! — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)

Dot-sucks sucks because it is such crude slang [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

I forgot something — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:26 PM (3/13)

You forgot something even more important...."your point"....and it is??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
umm — Buddha, October 30 @ 10:16 PM (1/7)

Point is ... .web sounds pretty basal today what with .biz and .info.. so stop flaming Easy..eom — mole, October 31 @ 2:28 PM (3/6)

Thanks mole — EasyTech, October 31 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)
"basil?" — cambler, October 31 @ 3:11 PM (1/1)

He means BANAL. LOL. [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 3 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

mole: n. A fleshy abnormal mass formed in the uterus — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:54 PM (1/2)

Greg.. you can run but you can't hide. Post in Afgan next time. — mole, October 31 @ 4:00 PM (1/1)

greg who? Afghan what? Are you on crack again?<eom> — Buddha, October 31 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

And? — cambler, October 30 @ 9:52 PM (1/3)

And... .web sounds pretty stupid today, so you missed your chance, move on. — mole, October 31 @ 2:30 PM (1/2)

Of Course "Mole" Thinks .WEB Sounds "Pretty Stupid" ... — GettingScrewed, October 31 @ 4:57 PM (1/1)

Tons, well ar.. sheesh...actually 3.. with media.club pending. well, quality, not quantity ---eom — mole, October 31 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)

AMEN! — Buddha, October 30 @ 12:31 AM (1/5)

Uh, Buddha? Oxymoron! — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 12:06 AM (1/4)

Uh, InternetAdvocate? Moron! — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:21 PM (2/3)

Uh, Buddha [a.k.a. Dave]? Always moron! — InternetAdvocate, November 3 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)
No respect for religion, you are very insulting — mole, October 31 @ 2:32 PM (1/1)

insulting? no respect for religion? — Buddha, October 31 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy