Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Wed, October 31, 2001 at 12:40 AM GMT (Tue, October 30, 2001 at 5:40 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Dot-sucks sucks really bad...
Message:
"Paul Garrin should have accepted .SUCKS, when Esther Dyson tried to hand it to him back in November 2000.  But no, he wanted to pig-out on hundreds ... all or nothing.  Well, he got nothing." Dot-CON or dot-bad is much better than dot-sucks. TLDs should never be slang [like sucks].

Message Thread:

• The .WEB pusher — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:39 AM (3/39)
• Thanks — cambler, October 30 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)
• Huh? — EasyTech, October 30 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
• 0:253     .WEB is in, all people have to do is develop it. — Jim Fleming, October 30 @ 11:46 AM (0/0)
• Are you saying. . . — 410, October 30 @ 11:43 AM (2/35)
• Sure they can support their investments, but... — EasyTech, October 30 @ 4:15 PM (3/28)
• EasyTech:  So what is your point?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
• Um... — 410, October 30 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
• Very poor argument — joinin, October 30 @ 4:32 PM (1/25)
• not only .WEB — EasyTech, October 30 @ 6:27 PM (2/24)
• Wrong Again EasyTech.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
• Great! — cambler, October 30 @ 8:08 PM (2/22)
• so what's your point? — EasyTech, October 30 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)
• My point — cambler, October 30 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)
• More substance please, Mr. Ambler — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:23 PM (2/19)
• Name.space Failed Because — GettingScrewed, October 31 @ 12:34 AM (1/4)
• Dot-sucks sucks really bad... — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 12:40 AM (2/3)
• Dot-not, dot-bad, dot-CON much better than dot-sucks [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)
• .con or .bad?   don't call us, we'll call you. NEXT! — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)
• Dot-sucks sucks because it is such crude slang [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)
• I forgot something — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:26 PM (3/13)
• You forgot something even more important...."your point"....and it is??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
• umm — Buddha, October 30 @ 10:16 PM (1/7)
• Point is ... .web sounds pretty basal today what with .biz and .info.. so stop flaming Easy..eom — mole, October 31 @ 2:28 PM (3/6)
• Thanks mole — EasyTech, October 31 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)
• "basil?" — cambler, October 31 @ 3:11 PM (1/1)
• He means BANAL. LOL. [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 3 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
• mole: n. A fleshy abnormal mass formed in the uterus — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:54 PM (1/2)
• Greg.. you can run but you can't hide. Post in Afgan next time. — mole, October 31 @ 4:00 PM (1/1)
• greg who? Afghan what? Are you on crack again?<eom> — Buddha, October 31 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)
• And? — cambler, October 30 @ 9:52 PM (1/3)
• And... .web sounds pretty stupid today, so you missed your chance, move on. — mole, October 31 @ 2:30 PM (1/2)
• Of Course "Mole" Thinks .WEB Sounds "Pretty Stupid" ... — GettingScrewed, October 31 @ 4:57 PM (1/1)
• Tons, well ar.. sheesh...actually 3.. with media.club pending. well, quality, not quantity ---eom — mole, October 31 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)
• AMEN! — Buddha, October 30 @ 12:31 AM (1/5)
• Uh, Buddha? Oxymoron! — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 12:06 AM (1/4)
• Uh, InternetAdvocate? Moron! — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:21 PM (2/3)
• Uh, Buddha [a.k.a. Dave]? Always moron! — InternetAdvocate, November 3 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)
• No respect for religion, you are very insulting — mole, October 31 @ 2:32 PM (1/1)
• insulting? no respect for religion? — Buddha, October 31 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy