Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	EasyTech
Date/Time:	Wed, October 31, 2001 at 4:08 PM GMT (Wed, October 31, 2001 at 5:08 PM CET)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0 using Windows 98
Subject:	yes
Message:
I don't want to start another flame therefore I won't define "better". But I think you would agree that IOD is a better registry than dotSEX. Also IMHO there are other registries which did/do a better job than IOD. But that's my opinion, and I think you, Gregory and Shelby has another.

Message Thread:

• New TLD - Proof of Concept — Garry Anderson, October 31 @ 10:13 AM (1/14)
• Already available — EasyTech, October 31 @ 1:55 PM (1/13)
• No it is not — Garry Anderson, October 31 @ 2:08 PM (1/12)
• huh? — EasyTech, October 31 @ 3:51 PM (2/11)
• Viewpoint — Garry Anderson, October 31 @ 4:07 PM (1/8)
• my answer — EasyTech, October 31 @ 4:35 PM (1/7)
• My fault? — Garry Anderson, November 1 @ 9:54 AM (1/6)
• Things are clearer now! — EasyTech, November 1 @ 12:50 AM (1/5)
• Benefit — Garry Anderson, November 1 @ 1:30 PM (1/4)
• okay — EasyTech, November 1 @ 3:02 PM (1/3)
• Analogy — Garry Anderson, November 2 @ 8:22 AM (1/2)
• The IPv8 Exclusive Root — Jim Fleming, November 2 @ 2:20 PM (1/1)
• Protocol is just one factor — Garry Anderson, November 2 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
• Again, what's your point? — cambler, October 31 @ 3:55 PM (1/1)
• yes — EasyTech, October 31 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy