Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
onmove |
Date/Time: |
Mon, November 5, 2001 at 3:12 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95 |
Subject: |
A case for refund of pre-registration fees. |
Message: |
|
Apart from the ethical considerations,
there are technical grounds for refund of landrush pre-registration fees for those
names which were taken up in the sunrise period. Pre-registration fees were
charged for submitting names to Afilias. This was the basic promise.
But, as we know registrars never submitted those names in landrush period which were
taken up in the sunrise period. When the basic promise was not fulfilled there
is no moral or legal grounds for charging the fee. DomainBank has refunded
such charges and they should be appreciated for their effort. But, other registrars
like Catalog.com, Register.com and Names4Ever.com continue to hold on to money they
charged without providing promised service. ICANN and Afilias have some responsibility
in this matter. They are accredited registrars. People pay little more
to deal with accredited registrars because they feel they have recourse if something
goes wrong.(I don't mean those who are not accredited should not refund) Otherwise,
what is the sanctity of accredition? Catalog.com, Register.com and Names4Ever.com
must refund the landrush pre-registrations charges for the names which were taken
up in sunrise period. They had use of funds for such a long time. That
is enough. Amar
|
| |
Message Thread:
- A case for refund of pre-registration fees. onmove, November 5 @ 3:12 PM (1/7)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy