Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: S. Hudgens
Date/Time: Wed, November 7, 2001 at 7:14 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject: IOD and .WEB

Message:
 

 
The message remains the same, regardless of who supports it.  That message is, regardless of what you think about .WEB as a TLD, that Image Online Design is by far the more competent among the applicants in the second round (and of the first round, as recent developments have shown).

We can debate for eons about whether .WEB would be a good choice for inclusion in the root.  I think it would be wonderful, and I believe I have a good deal of support in that belief.  Some here have expressed otherwise, and that is fine.  What is not debatable is whether IOD is up to the task of running it.  To that end I must agree with Jim Fleming.  IOD is run by professionals, not amateurs.

So, I would like to see more discussion on this forum not about whether .WEB is a good TLD or a bad TLD, but about the expertise and professionalism of IOD, and how approval of its application would benefit all of us in the long run.

Shelby Hudgens
 


Message Thread: