Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	antipodes
Date/Time:	Sat, November 10, 2001 at 10:57 AM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.74 using Windows 98
Subject:	thanks Dave - from memory it was eNom with whom Freeregistration
Message:
operated.  That was one company whose business practices I greatly disliked.  Claim to be one thing but in reality they were just another relatively expensive registrar or shop front touting for business for a registrar.  Needless to say, the four preregistrations I bought from them at their most expensive rate for Landrush submission were taken in Sunrise. ICANN and Afilias wonder why we are as mad as hell about the way we were treated when some of the registrars behaved like used car salesmen.

Message Thread:

• Joker.com still recommended by Afilias...? — richard_henderson, November 9 @ 9:41 PM (1/11)
• Joker.com --- one of the best — IncompetentAfilias, November 10 @ 1:08 AM (2/10)
• What Joker.com should do to prove their "honesty" — richard_henderson, November 10 @ 8:18 AM (1/4)
• can't change anything unless there's a challenge — DaveKing2, November 10 @ 8:28 AM (1/3)
• Why I still feel sceptical about many of Joker's 333 names (many great generics) — richard_henderson, November 10 @ 10:05 AM (1/2)
• Common Sense — Garry Anderson, November 10 @ 10:35 AM (1/1)
• Common Sense says these Generics probably have FAKE trademarks! Take a look... — richard_henderson, November 10 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)
• I concur — DaveKing2, November 10 @ 2:00 AM (1/4)
• More on Joker.com — IncompetentAfilias, November 10 @ 5:51 AM (1/3)
• so, Joker charged nothing to preregister, but others like — antipodes, November 10 @ 7:23 AM (1/2)
• Yup — DaveKing2, November 10 @ 8:18 AM (1/1)
• thanks Dave - from memory it was eNom with whom Freeregistration — antipodes, November 10 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy