Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	RayF
Date/Time:	Wed, November 21, 2001 at 9:36 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	finite population
Message:
speculators going after a finite list of domain names in a new TLD (that probably totals less than 100,000 in today's aftermarket climate) does not constitute an ongoing trend that is being cited.  Unless catastrophic, market caps do not take major hits based upon actions that are considered to be one time occurrences. It is more the case that content is being expected to support the new TLD's thus further motivating the market place to participate through the course of time (a revenue trend that is away from com/net/org). Ray

Message Thread:

• ICANN's Lynn: No new domains anytime soon — Garry Anderson, November 21 @ 1:55 AM (4/24)
• Darwinian Natural Selection — psbyowner, November 23 @ 6:32 PM (1/3)
• Memorability matters most — Garry Anderson, November 23 @ 10:45 PM (1/2)
• It depends on the situation — psbyowner, November 24 @ 6:45 PM (1/1)
• Wrong comparison — Garry Anderson, November 25 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)
• this should help new.net — Anion, November 21 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)
• New.net Is A Joke ... Funny Haha — GettingScrewed, November 22 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
• Wall Street TLD trend analysis — RayF, November 21 @ 6:14 PM (1/2)
• 300,000 decline in com/net/org — Garry Anderson, November 21 @ 7:13 PM (1/1)
• finite population — RayF, November 21 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
• Good-We don't need more domains — psbyowner, November 21 @ 5:18 PM (5/14)
• If IOD wasn't running .web, think ICANN would have approved — vera-city, November 21 @ 8:36 PM (1/1)
• In my opinion... — Garry Anderson, November 22 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)
• For my fiscal self interest - I agree. However... — Garry Anderson, November 21 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
• Good - we don't need more burger joints — cambler, November 21 @ 6:57 PM (3/5)
• True ... — GettingScrewed, November 22 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
• It's not the same and you know it.. — challenge, November 21 @ 8:14 PM (2/2)
• Expanding your analogy — Garry Anderson, November 22 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
• Sorry — cambler, November 21 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)
• Demand should not prohibit new competition — Garry Anderson, November 21 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
• Sounds logical. — onmove, November 21 @ 6:14 PM (2/2)
• Market awareness — Garry Anderson, November 21 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
• Detrimental? — cambler, November 21 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)
• hell, we hardly need the internet ! — stuart, November 21 @ 6:10 PM (1/1)
• What no Internet! - what will I do with myself..... ;-) — Garry Anderson, November 21 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy