Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Tue, November 27, 2001 at 10:13 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	The US DOC are ultimately responsible
Message:
They are aware of the illegalities that have being perpetrated. ICANN was put in place to give them a level of deniability. Most here know that I believe the authorities corrupt. Is this Afilias disgrace not more evidence?
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• theinternetchallenge.com — PAWEL, November 26 @ 10:08 PM (2/15)
• silenced, Vint......... — richard_henderson, November 26 @ 11:18 PM (5/13)
• Support for the internetchallenge.com — psbyowner, November 27 @ 3:48 PM (1/1)
• Right or wrong doesn't matter much anymore. — vera-city, November 27 @ 7:31 PM (0/0)
• I have a question Mr. Henderson — helumuc, November 27 @ 3:02 PM (2/6)
• Do you think its legal to misrepresent your trademark rights? Do you think ... — mole, November 27 @ 4:52 PM (2/4)
• desperate times call for desperate measures — antipodes, November 27 @ 8:51 PM (1/1)
• The US DOC are ultimately responsible — Garry Anderson, November 27 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
• Oh - have i said anything against theinternetchallenge.com??? — helumuc, November 27 @ 5:38 PM (1/1)
• helumac, it's okay. Not everyone is born equal. Good luck! --- elom — mole, November 28 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
• Blames of a fraudster — EasyTech, November 27 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
• Let's start "TheInternetChallenge.Com" Legal relief fund. — vera-city, November 27 @ 5:18 AM (0/0)
• In defense of Vint Cerf......He is one of the good guys — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 27 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)
• You did a great initiative Richard. When the bully boys come chasing, you know they have something. — mole, November 27 @ 1:38 AM (1/1)
• Richard's work is commendable...... — onmove, November 27 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
• WIPO took it for internetchallenge.com perhaps? — Garry Anderson, November 26 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy