Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	arbitrator
Date/Time:	Thu, November 29, 2001 at 12:43 AM GMT (Thu, November 29, 2001 at 6:13 PM IST)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	ADD IN ABOVE > Business.info
Message:
Whois info is not updated yet by afilias. But the TM info for you is this: Trademark Name:            BUSINESS Trademark Date:            1990-10-09 Trademark Country:         INDIA Trademark Number:          538048 Check them with Indian TM Registry Link below. Or check it free at http://www.arbitratoronline.org       Your Online Arbitration Solutions.
Link:	Indian TM Registry

Message Thread:

• Business.info — arbitrator, November 29 @ 11:29 AM (5/31)
• Could Afilias successfully challenge Business.info? — IncompetentAfilias, November 29 @ 6:50 PM (1/1)
• Nothing to do with generic. Also don't forget about Afilias' GOVINDA LEOPOLD, who STOLE Hawaii.info — spot, November 29 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
• Please will you answer a few questions? — Garry Anderson, November 29 @ 1:13 PM (1/8)
• I admire you Garry — arbitrator, November 29 @ 2:08 PM (1/7)
• Moral of the story for future gTLDs like .inc .... — mole, November 29 @ 2:37 PM (1/6)
• Can you get some for me ? — arbitrator, November 29 @ 3:18 PM (1/5)
• You obviously don't know anything — mole, November 29 @ 3:24 PM (1/4)
• Means You Accept your mistake — arbitrator, November 29 @ 3:27 PM (1/3)
• Not exactly. I hate spamming laywers thats all, just my opinion --- elom — mole, November 29 @ 3:32 PM (1/2)
• frustration — arbitrator, November 29 @ 3:33 PM (1/1)
• Lost for words? Figures --- elom — mole, November 29 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)
• ADD IN ABOVE > Business.info — arbitrator, November 29 @ 12:43 AM (1/7)
• is there a online database? eom — EasyTech, November 29 @ 3:19 PM (1/6)
• IT IS PREPARING — arbitrator, November 29 @ 3:37 PM (1/5)
• Preparing for what? In development.... elom — mole, November 29 @ 3:40 PM (1/4)
• web Interface .. — arbitrator, November 29 @ 3:41 PM (1/3)
• *smile* you didn't get it. Never mind *smile* — mole, November 29 @ 3:42 PM (1/2)
• * frustrated smile on your face * — arbitrator, November 29 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)
• whahahahhahahaaa... you must think this trademark thing is all a game to be manipulated --elom — mole, November 29 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)
• Your client may lose the name... — arbitrage, November 29 @ 11:56 AM (1/2)
• Sorry — arbitartor, November 29 @ 12:45 AM (1/1)
• Lawyers are now playing the game with clever tricks ...hmmmm ----elom — mole, November 29 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)
• TM on BUSINESS - shall we laugh?? — helumuc, November 29 @ 11:56 AM (2/8)
• don't you get it? — EasyTech, November 29 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)
• People have been playing the trademark system for years, the world is no longer assumed ethical.. — mole, November 29 @ 2:46 PM (1/6)
• Trade Mark for Business.info — wmd, November 29 @ 4:05 PM (1/5)
• I have no interest in business.info, I just hate spamming lawyers who compound the fiasco -- elom — mole, November 29 @ 4:40 PM (2/4)
• why would you have an interest in business.info when you own — antipodes, December 1 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)
• btw... stop cloaking, arbitrator. I recommend grammar check software before you post---elom — mole, November 29 @ 4:46 PM (1/2)
• and spelling check software for moi *evil grin* --- elom — mole, November 29 @ 4:47 PM (1/1)
• I am not a front or cloaking for anybody — wmd, November 30 @ 6:25 AM (0/0)