Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Mon, December 17, 2001 at 9:31 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	"failure to do so will cost them much bad publicity"
Message:
Yes, but along with the BAD publicity - they will have all that GOOD money. I have no doubt, that should it come to court - that they will all use the same lie: "It was all proof of concept, your honor. Can you understand it all - how was we supposed to know what was to happen?" The old duffer in charge of trial would be bamboozled by it all - "Case dismissed - no charges."
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• NeuLevel .BIZ Application Refunds??  Any suggestions? — Ron_Bennett, December 17 @ 7:30 PM (2/8)
• dotbizlottery — crs, December 18 @ 9:03 AM (1/1)
• RegLand and the current registry and registrar culture — antipodes, December 18 @ 11:53 AM (0/0)
• Depends on terms of agreement — Garry Anderson, December 17 @ 7:57 PM (1/5)
• Did more reading - NeuLevel has returned the applications back to their originating BIZ registrars — Ron_Bennett, December 17 @ 8:17 PM (1/4)
• "failure to do so will cost them much bad publicity" — Garry Anderson, December 17 @ 9:31 PM (2/3)
• Were I leading prosecution — Garry Anderson, December 18 @ 1:53 AM (1/1)
• and one other important point: the bank charges them a fee to cash the cheque. — spot, December 18 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)
• An icing is no more a pudding than you are want of the Shakespearean "Brain" - Quo Vadis??? — IntemetAdvocate, December 17 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy