Would put them at disadvantage

Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Garry Anderson

Date/Time: Thu, December 20, 2001 at 9:17 AM GMT

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98

Subject: Would put them at disadvantage

Message:

They stood a reasonable chance of getting good generic name.
If they put in again, it would likely be against a lot more applicants - so lessening their chances.
They should be put in for the draw they applied for - and not have to pay twice for it.
It was the fault of those running the scheme, after all - was it not?

Link: WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

the best way, the tested way, would be first-come, first-serve — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 7:32 AM (2/18)

Agree with you Garry - the main problem... — richard_henderson, December 20 @ 8:41 AM (1/1)

Corruption was quite clear to me from the start — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 8:59 AM (0/0)

Compare - "random, round-robin" process that is fair to all applicants — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 8:34 AM (1/15)

Suggestion: All Landrush pre-registration fees should be refunded. eom — vera-city, December 20 @ 9:09 AM (1/14)

Would put them at disadvantage — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 9:17 AM (2/13)

proposal for giving LandRush I participants standing in LandRush II — Domebase, December 20 @ 9:26 AM (2/7)

Compromise — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
Why didn't they opt for the original Domebase solution? — richard_henderson, December 20 @ 9:42 AM (2/5)

Have no doubt that the exact sequence of Sunrise, pregreg and challenges was planned — spot2, December 20 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)
Suggestion: Landrush 1 applicants need to be made whole... — vera-city, December 20 @ 9:55 AM (1/3)

Thanks for feedback. Excluding new applicants from LR II? — DomeBase, December 21 @ 2:08 AM (1/2)

Equitable Solution Vs GOLD RUSH - Bob, I would love to be — antipathy, December 21 @ 5:08 AM (1/1)

Merry Christmas Antipodes/pathy — DomeBase, December 22 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)

Suggestion amended: The original pool of applicants should not be expanded... — vera-city, December 20 @ 9:22 AM (2/4)

Vera, I can't see how we can have both. I think the — antipathy, December 20 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)
That's just silly... — arbitrage, December 20 @ 9:52 AM (1/2)

Landrush II — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 8:28 PM (1/1)

Please don't misunderstand me... — arbitrage, December 21 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy