Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	vera-city
Date/Time:	Fri, December 21, 2001 at 5:28 AM GMT
Browser:	AOL Browser V5.0 using Windows 98
Subject:	Thank you.
Message:
Still why bother with WIPO at all for those registrations that appear facially invalid? It would seem that if Afilias can identify them, if any, well enough to challenge, why not simply just contact the registrant and either fix the registration data or delete the registration without WIPOs involvement? Those registrations that may appear facially invalid perhaps shouldn't be there to begin with. Maybe use WIPO for allegedly false trademark data registrations, if any, which appear facially valid?

Message Thread:

• WIPO> Posted Challengers Name in .info — SanjeevGoyal, December 19 @ 10:35 PM (4/8)
• Question: What's with all this WIPO stuff anyway? — vera-city, December 20 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
• Question: What criteria does WIPO use when deciding a challenge? — vera-city, December 20 @ 5:24 PM (1/2)
• It's pretty straightforward--read on.. — Watchman, December 20 @ 11:52 PM (1/1)
• Thank you. — vera-city, December 21 @ 5:28 AM (0/0)
• Blinking heck - have you seen those transfered? — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 7:07 AM (1/2)
• Does Kubiak really have valid TMs for America.info etc — spot2, December 20 @ 7:18 AM (1/1)
• I would like to see evidence — Garry Anderson, December 20 @ 7:39 AM (0/0)
• So how do Yesnic explain their fake TMs now?... — richard_henderson, December 20 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy